What security grade does ai-driven-development have?

ai-driven-development is graded UNSAFE by AgentSkillsHub's rule-based security scan (SlowMist 11 red-flag categories). Flagged unsafe — do NOT run against real credentials or production data.

Is ai-driven-development safe to install?

Security audit of CodeAlive-AI/ai-driven-development · MCP Server by CodeAlive-AI · ★ 95

✕ UNSAFE Basic audit · rule-based scan · SlowMist 11 red-flag categories

No — ai-driven-development was flagged UNSAFE by AgentSkillsHub's security scan. Do not run it against real credentials or production data.

What it is: Practices, protocols, and skills for AI-driven software development. Skills and safety hooks for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, Antigravity, and any agent supporting the Agent Skills standard.

Red flags detected (2)

🚩 curl pipe shell
🚩 sudo usage

Audit summary

Security grade	✕ UNSAFE
Quality score	67/100
GitHub stars	95
Language	Python
License	MIT
Last updated	2026-06-30

Check before you install

What credentials does it ask for, and where are they stored?
Is the maintainer identifiable and the repo actively maintained?
Read the install scripts and network calls before trusting it.

Run a live scan → Full details & install 5-dimension deep audit

This is AgentSkillsHub's free basic audit: an automated rule-based scan covering SlowMist's 11 red-flag categories (credential exfiltration, obfuscated payloads, sandbox escape, prompt injection, and more) across 117,000+ open-source AI agent skills and MCP servers, refreshed every 8 hours. A UNSAFE grade is a scan result, not a guarantee — deep 5-dimension audits (code · credentials · vendor · supply-chain · operational) are available for enterprise. Audited: 2026-07-03.