What security grade does human-writing have?

human-writing is graded SAFE by AgentSkillsHub's rule-based security scan (SlowMist 11 red-flag categories). Reviewed, no blocking issues found — reasonable for general use. Still confirm credential handling before production use.

Is human-writing safe to install?

Security audit of KKKKhazix/human-writing · Agent Tool by KKKKhazix · ★ 2.4k

✓ SAFE Basic audit · rule-based scan · SlowMist 11 red-flag categories

Yes — human-writing passed AgentSkillsHub's rule-based security scan with no dangerous patterns detected. As with any third-party skill, confirm what credentials it requests before production use.

What it is: 让 AI 写的中文读起来像一个具体的人在说话。通用创作与改稿 Skill，开箱即用。

No dangerous patterns were detected: no credential exfiltration, no obfuscated downloads, no sandbox-escape attempts, no prompt-injection markers.

Audit summary

Security grade	✓ SAFE
Quality score	63/100
GitHub stars	2.4k
Language	Python
License	MIT
Last updated	2026-08-11

Check before you install

What credentials does it ask for, and where are they stored?
Is the maintainer identifiable and the repo actively maintained?
Read the install scripts and network calls before trusting it.

Run a live scan → Full details & install 5-dimension deep audit

Related Agent Tool audits

Is superpowers safe? — SAFE · ★ 273.9k
Is skills safe? — SAFE · ★ 210.1k
Is AutoGPT safe? — SAFE · ★ 186.7k
Is ollama safe? — SAFE · ★ 178.9k
Is langflow safe? — SAFE · ★ 153.5k
Is langchain safe? — SAFE · ★ 144.5k

Browse all Agent Tool skills →

This is AgentSkillsHub's free basic audit: an automated rule-based scan covering SlowMist's 11 red-flag categories (credential exfiltration, obfuscated payloads, sandbox escape, prompt injection, and more) across 130,000+ open-source AI agent skills and MCP servers, refreshed every 8 hours. A SAFE grade is a scan result, not a guarantee — deep 5-dimension audits (code · credentials · vendor · supply-chain · operational) are available for enterprise. Audited: 2026-08-19.