Is nexting safe to install?

Security audit of Nexting-ai/nexting · Claude Skill by Nexting-ai · ★ 2.0k

✓ SAFE Basic audit · rule-based scan · 42 published rules

Yes — nexting passed AgentSkillsHub's rule-based security scan with no dangerous patterns detected. As with any third-party skill, confirm what credentials it requests before production use.

What it is: Remote control for Claude Code, Codex, Grok, and Cursor on Mac or PC. View sessions, send tasks, and drive them remotely from your phone, PIN, or Ring. OpenClaw supported.

No dangerous patterns were detected: no credential exfiltration, no obfuscated downloads, no sandbox-escape attempts, no prompt-injection markers.

Audit summary

Security grade	✓ SAFE
Quality score	65/100
GitHub stars	2.0k
Language	C
License	MIT
Last updated	2026-10-20

Check before you install

What credentials does it ask for, and where are they stored?
Is the maintainer identifiable and the repo actively maintained?
Read the install scripts and network calls before trusting it.

Run a live scan → Full details & install 5-dimension deep audit

Related Claude Skill audits

Is skills safe? — SAFE · ★ 180.2k
Is claude-code safe? — SAFE · ★ 152.8k
Is claude-mem safe? — SAFE · ★ 102.3k
Is Understand-Anything safe? — SAFE · ★ 87.7k
Is archify safe? — SAFE · ★ 87.6k
Is codegraph safe? — SAFE · ★ 74.7k

Browse all Claude Skill skills →

This is AgentSkillsHub's free basic audit: an automated rule-based scan with 42 published rules built on SlowMist's agent-security taxonomy (credential theft, obfuscated payloads, privilege escalation, covert instructions to the agent, and more) across 186,000+ open-source AI agent skills and MCP servers, refreshed every 8 hours. A SAFE grade is a scan result, not a guarantee — deep 5-dimension audits (code · credentials · vendor · supply-chain · operational) are available for enterprise. Audited: 2026-10-22.