Is codeg safe to install?

Security audit of spacering-net/codeg · Codex Skill by spacering-net · ★ 4.1k

✓ SAFE Basic audit · rule-based scan · 42 published rules

Yes — codeg passed AgentSkillsHub's rule-based security scan with no dangerous patterns detected. As with any third-party skill, confirm what credentials it requests before production use.

What it is: Collaborative multi-agent AI coding workspace: aggregate sessions from Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Pi, Grok Build, etc. Desktop app, self-hosted server, or Docker.

No dangerous patterns were detected: no credential exfiltration, no obfuscated downloads, no sandbox-escape attempts, no prompt-injection markers.

Audit summary

Security grade	✓ SAFE
Quality score	55/100
GitHub stars	4.1k
Language	Rust
License	Apache-2.0
Last updated	2026-10-24

Check before you install

What credentials does it ask for, and where are they stored?
Is the maintainer identifiable and the repo actively maintained?
Read the install scripts and network calls before trusting it.

Run a live scan → Full details & install 5-dimension deep audit

Related Codex Skill audits

Is openclaw safe? — SAFE · ★ 392.9k
Is hermes-agent safe? — SAFE · ★ 256.8k
Is ui-ux-pro-max-skill safe? — SAFE · ★ 139.5k
Is agent-skills safe? — SAFE · ★ 106.2k
Is orca safe? — SAFE · ★ 104.8k
Is open-design safe? — SAFE · ★ 103.7k

Browse all Codex Skill skills →

This is AgentSkillsHub's free basic audit: an automated rule-based scan with 42 published rules built on SlowMist's agent-security taxonomy (credential theft, obfuscated payloads, privilege escalation, covert instructions to the agent, and more) across 186,000+ open-source AI agent skills and MCP servers, refreshed every 8 hours. A SAFE grade is a scan result, not a guarantee — deep 5-dimension audits (code · credentials · vendor · supply-chain · operational) are available for enterprise. Audited: 2026-10-25.