by 0sec-labs · MCP Server · ★ 80
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npm install -g 0sec-cliTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 80 |
| Forks | 11 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 58/100 |
| Open Issues | 11 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-20 |
| Created | 2026-08-19 |
| Platforms | mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
We make software secure itself. Your self-improving, open-source cybersecurity team. Research Preview. The Swiss Applied AI & Cybersecurity Research Lab · 0.security <img src="https:
Looking for a 0sec alternative? If you're comparing 0sec with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Access control for AI agents. Set what Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor and any MCP server are allowed to do
Security scanner MCP server for AI coding agents. Prompt injection firewall, package hallucination detection (
AI-powered penetration testing MCP server
Full-spectrum security assessment tool for opencode — defensive code audit (17 vulnerability categories) + off
Open-source cybersecurity analysis agent for Claude Code. Scans projects for vulnerabilities across all OWASP
Static security scanner for LLM agents — prompt injection, MCP config auditing, taint analysis. 51 rules mappe
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: