by 0xSanei · Codex Skill · ★ 86
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/0xSanei/darwinia.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 86 |
| Forks | 5 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-13 |
| Created | 2026-04-03 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~71k |
🧬 Darwinia Give your AI agent the power to evolve its own trading strategies. Trading agents that discover strategies through Darwinian selection and adversarial self-play — not human-written rules. <img src="https://colab.research.goog
Looking for a darwinia alternative? If you're comparing darwinia with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Multi-agent team operating system for Claude Code. 108 MCP tools, 40+ agent templates, 10 lifecycle hooks, 7 p
**⚔️ Alicization Town** is a decentralized, multi-agent pixel sandbox world powered by the **Model Context Pro
Kindly Web Search MCP Server: Web search + robust content retrieval for AI coding tools (Claude Code, Codex, C
AI-powered Vibe Investing for NASDAQ, S&P500 & crypto: LLM quant trading tools, multi-agent backtesting, and d
Fully Autonomous AI Research System with Self-Evolution, built natively on Claude Code
A collection of AI agent skills for Clawdbot, Claude Code, Codex
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: