by Agent-Threat-Rule · MCP Server · ★ 426
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npm install agent-threat-rules
npm install -g agent-threat-rulesTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 426 |
| Forks | 66 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 69/100 |
| Open Issues | 42 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-07 |
| Created | 2026-03-09 |
| Platforms | mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~22k |
ATR — Agent Threat Rules Open detection rule format for AI agent security threats. AI Agent 威脅偵測規則的開放格式 A
Looking for a agent-threat-rules alternative? If you're comparing agent-threat-rules with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Open-source runtime AI agent security tool - monitors and controls AI agents, catching malicious tool use, pro
Security scanner MCP server for AI coding agents. Prompt injection firewall, package hallucination detection (
Security toolkit for AI agents. Scan your machine for dangerous skills and MCP configs, monitor for supply cha
Think before doing, prove before saving. Vestige is the local-first cognitive operating system and determinist
🛡️ A curated list of resources on agent skills security: attacks, defenses, frameworks, and benchmarks for se
Static security scanner for LLM agents — prompt injection, MCP config auditing, taint analysis. 51 rules mappe
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: