No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by Alishahryar1 · Codex Skill · ★ 56.5k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is free-claude-code safe to install? View the security audit →
Quick Start · Providers · Clients · Integrations · Manage Ind
| Stars | 56,530 |
| Forks | 9,038 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| Quality Score | 62.9533624926849/100 |
| Open Issues | 308 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-04 |
| Created | 2026-01-28 |
| Platforms | browser, claude-code, codex, python, vscode |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
These tools work well together with free-claude-code for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a free-claude-code alternative? If you're comparing free-claude-code with other codex skill tools, these 2 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
free-claude-code is Use Claude Code, Codex, VSCode, Pi, and OpenCode (and 6 other harnesses) for free (1.3B+ free tokens) from your terminal, app, IDE, or phone, and now from the browser with native browser sessions (mul. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 56.5k GitHub stars.
free-claude-code is primarily written in Python.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the free-claude-code GitHub repository at github.com/Alishahryar1/free-claude-code. The project has 56.5k stars and 9038 forks, indicating an active community.
The top alternatives to free-claude-code on Agent Skills Hub include humanizer, superset. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: