by Amey-Thakur · MCP Server · ★ 120
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 120 |
| Forks | 41 |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 55/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-05 |
| Created | 2026-07-27 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~22k |
Claude Certifications One place to prepare for every Anthropic Claude certification. Official exam guides, blueprints, policies, courses, and study notes, collected and organized so you can spend your time studying, not searching.
Looking for a CLAUDE-CERTIFICATIONS alternative? If you're comparing CLAUDE-CERTIFICATIONS with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A practitioner guide for the Anthropic Claude Certified Developer - Foundations (CCDV-F) exam. 23 chapters on
Study materials, code examples, and practice scenarios for Anthropic's Claude Certified Architect: Foundations
Run Claude Desktop’s Cowork mode natively on Linux — no macOS or VM required
Build mods for Claude Code: Hook any request, modify any response, /model "with-your-custom-model", intelligen
HeyClaude (formerly Claude Pro Directory) is a searchable collection of pre-built AI skills, agents, MCP serve
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: