No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by Azure-Samples · MCP Server · ★ 100
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is agent-architecture-review-sample safe to install? View the security audit →
Architecture Review Agent Sample [ and Image Models (Dall-E, SDXL), Speed Up Responses,
🗂️🤖 Airtable Model Context Protocol Server, for allowing AI systems to interact with your Airtable bases
A curated collection of resources for 🌌 Azure OpenAI, 🦙 LLMs (+RAG, Agents). Monthly Updates.
Giving Claude ability to run code with E2B via MCP (Model Context Protocol)
Co-create PowerPoint slide decks with AI
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
agent-architecture-review-sample is The Architecture Review Agent is an open-source AI agent sample that reviews software architectures and generates interactive diagrams automatically.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 100 GitHub stars.
agent-architecture-review-sample is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent-architecture, architecture-review, azd-ai-templates.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the agent-architecture-review-sample GitHub repository at github.com/Azure-Samples/agent-architecture-review-sample. The project has 100 stars and 41 forks, indicating an active community.
agent-architecture-review-sample is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to agent-architecture-review-sample on Agent Skills Hub include excalimate, GPTRouter, airtable-mcp-server. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: