by Azure-Samples · MCP Server · ★ 204
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 204 |
| Forks | 98 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 70/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-28 |
| Created | 2025-07-07 |
| Platforms | mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
AI Agent with MCP tools using LangChain.js ⭐ If you like this sample, star it on GitHub — it helps a lot! [Overview](
Looking for a mcp-agent-langchainjs alternative? If you're comparing mcp-agent-langchainjs with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
MCP Server for Adobe After Effects. Enables remote control (compositions, text, shapes, solids, properties) vi
The TypeScript framework for MCP servers Build MCP tools that share services, validate inputs and apply the ac
Ultimate Context Engineering Infrastructure, starting from MCPs and Integrations
A model-driven approach to building AI agents in just a few lines of code.
Release channel for TheAuditor — see blog.theauditortool.com
Govern & Secure your AI
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: