by Bentlybro · MCP Server · ★ 7
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 7 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-19 |
| Created | 2026-09-19 |
| Platforms | cli, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
Fast, cheap judgment for AI coding agents: semantic search, focused reads and list picking in ~2s. CLI + MCP server on TypeSafe Jev. Benchmarked on SWE-bench.
Looking for a siftr alternative? If you're comparing siftr with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Local-first AI memory archive. Import ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok exports, generate semantic embeddings, and sea
Deep code indexing MCP server for AI agents. 25 tools: hybrid FTS5 + embedding search, call graphs, git blame/
Verifiable AI coding agent harness / 可验证的 AI 编码代理：evidence hash-chain · hollow-answer gate · manual verificati
Vendor-neutral MCP configuration manager — one CLI to add, toggle, and audit MCP servers and skills across eve
Multi-agent teams for real work: run teams of coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, any model) in isolated git wo
🧠 High-performance persistent memory system for Model Context Protocol (MCP) powered by libSQL. Features vect
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: