by BerriAI · MCP Server · ★ 62.9k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
pip install litellm
pip install 'litellm[proxy]'
Taken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
Flagged: environment access. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 62,852 |
| Forks | 13,081 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Open Issues | 5706 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-07 |
| Created | 2023-07-27 |
| Platforms | mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
🚅 LiteLLM Call 100+ LLMs in OpenAI format. [Bedrock, Azure, OpenAI, VertexAI, Anthropic, Groq, etc.] LiteLLM Proxy Server (AI Gateway) Enterprise Tier </
Looking for a litellm alternative? If you're comparing litellm with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Route to 1,600+ LLMs, 50+ AI Guardrails with 1 fast & fr
Unlimited FREE AI coding. Connect Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Cline, Copilot, Antigravity to FREE Claude/GPT/G
The agent engineering platform.
⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in. Built by Stencil Labs.
CLI proxy that reduces LLM token consumption by 60-90% on common dev commands. Single Rust binary, zero depend
A powerful GUI app and Toolkit for Claude Code - Create custom agents, manage interactive Claude Code sessions
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: