Qu1cksc0pe — security grade SAFE, quality 65/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 65/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by CYB3RMX · MCP Server · ★ 2.0k

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is Qu1cksc0pe safe to install? View the security audit →

About Qu1cksc0pe

Qu1cksc0pe All-in-One malware analysis tool for analyze many file types, from Windows binaries to E-Mail files. You can get: What DLL files are used. Functions and APIs. Sections and segments. URLs, IP addresses and emails. Android permissions (Dangerous/Special/Info). MITRE ATT&CK mappings (Windows + Linux static analysis). File extensions and their names. Embedded executables/exploits. And so on... Qu1cksc0pe aims to get even more information about suspicious files and helps user realize what that file is capable of. Qu1cksc0pe Can Analyze Currently | MacOS E

all-in-oneapkelfexelinuxmalwaremalware-analysismcpmcp-serverosx

Quick Facts

Stars2,049
Forks259
LanguageYARA
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseGPL-3.0
Quality Score64.7771994646225/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-09-01
Created2019-10-18
Platformsmcp
Est. Tokens~23k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with Qu1cksc0pe for enhanced workflows:

  • malwoverview — semantic(0.51)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop (62%)
  • LitterBox — semantic(0.44)+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (55%)
  • agentic-malware-analysis — semantic(0.46)+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (51%)
  • darknet-mcp-server — semantic(0.41)+rare_topics+similar_pop+shared_platform (48%)

Qu1cksc0pe alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a Qu1cksc0pe alternative? If you're comparing Qu1cksc0pe with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • mcp-client-for-ollama by jonigl · ⭐ 820

    Harness the power of local LLMs with this TUI MCP Client for Ollama. Featuring all core MCP primitives (tools,

  • CyberStrike by CyberStrikeus · ⭐ 1.9k

    Open-source AI-augmented offensive security harness. 13+ autonomous agents, 150+ LLM providers, 5,300+ models,

  • LitterBox by BlackSnufkin · ⭐ 1.5k

    A self-hosted sandbox for red teams to test payloads against modern detection before deployment. MCP integrati

  • agentic-radar by splx-ai · ⭐ 1.0k

    A security scanner for your LLM agentic workflows

  • medusa by Pantheon-Security · ⭐ 962

    AI-first security scanner. NEW in v2026.7: Claude Code compromise detection — vet .claude/ hooks, permissions

  • sonarqube-mcp-server by SonarSource · ⭐ 648

    Official SonarQube MCP Server for code quality and security in AI agents

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular YARA Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Qu1cksc0pe?

Qu1cksc0pe is All-in-One malware analysis tool.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 2.0k GitHub stars.

What programming language is Qu1cksc0pe written in?

Qu1cksc0pe is primarily written in YARA. It covers topics such as all-in-one, apk, elf.

How do I install or use Qu1cksc0pe?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the Qu1cksc0pe GitHub repository at github.com/CYB3RMX/Qu1cksc0pe. The project has 2.0k stars and 259 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does Qu1cksc0pe use?

Qu1cksc0pe is released under the GPL-3.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to Qu1cksc0pe?

The top alternatives to Qu1cksc0pe on Agent Skills Hub include mcp-client-for-ollama, CyberStrike, LitterBox. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools