by CommitBrief · LLM Plugin · ★ 11
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 11 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | LLM Plugin |
| License | GPL-3.0 |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-10 |
| Created | 2026-05-25 |
| Platforms | cli, go |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
Local LLM code review CLI for git diffs — review staged/unstaged changes, any git diff range, or a GitHub PR, right in your terminal.
Looking for a commitbrief alternative? If you're comparing commitbrief with other llm plugin tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
CLI tool that generates commit messages from git changes, reviews code for quality issues, and provides debugg
✋ Interactive CLI tool for selecting and bundling code into a single, LLM-ready output file
Local-first AI knowledge layer. Extract architecture, query from any AI tool via MCP. Private by architecture.
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Process manager for AI agents (and humans)
Production-grade GitLab MCP server with 86 tools — full GitLab control from any AI agent (Claude, Cursor, Zed)
Explore other popular llm plugin tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: