No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by Dcatfly · MCP Server · ★ 57
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is weixin_claude_code safe to install? View the security audit →
weixin-claude-code 微信 Channel 插件 for Claude Code —— 通过微信与 Claude Code 双向通信。 基于 微信通信库，适配 Claude Code 的 Channel 功能实现。 English 功能 在微信中给 Claude Code 发消息，Claude 直接在终端中处理并回复到微信 支持文本、图片、语音、视频、文件等全媒体类型 微信扫码登录，零配置即用 Claude 回复自动转为纯文本（微信不支持 Markdown） 权限转发：Claude Code 的工具调用审批（如 Bash、Write、Edit）会转发到微信，直接回复 yes/no 即可远程授权，无需守在终端前 前置要求 Claude Code v2.1.80+ Bun 运行时 claude.ai 账号登录（不支持 API Key 认证） 安装 使用 启动 自定义 Channel 目前处于研究预览阶段，需要使用 标志启动。 首次登录 启动后 Claude 会提示你调用 工具，扫描二维码完成微信连接： Claude 调用 login 工具，展示二维码（如被折叠按 展开） 用微信扫描二维码 在微信中确认登录 连接成功，开始收发消息 收发消息 连接成功后，你在微信中发送的消息会实时推送到 Claude Code 会话中。Claude 处理后通过 工具将回复发回微信。 发送文本：直接在微信中输入文字 发送媒体：支持发送图片、语音、视频、文件，Claude 会下载并处理 接收回复：Claude 的回复会自动转为纯文本发送到微信 可用工具
| Stars | 57 |
| Forks | 12 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 61.1650035703126/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-03-26 |
| Created | 2026-03-22 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~33k |
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
weixin_claude_code is WeChat Channel plugin for Claude Code — bidirectional messaging between WeChat and Claude Code via MCP protocol. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 57 GitHub stars.
weixin_claude_code is primarily written in TypeScript.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the weixin_claude_code GitHub repository at github.com/Dcatfly/weixin_claude_code. The project has 57 stars and 12 forks, indicating an active community.
weixin_claude_code is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: