by DevMortimer · Agent Tool · ★ 178
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 178 |
| Forks | 32 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Open Issues | 5 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-04 |
| Created | 2026-09-16 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
pi-warden Your is a request. pi-warden is the check behind it. On every write and edit, Jev judges the change against the rules in your and quotes the broken rule back into the agent's own context. The same channel names slop, breaks retry loops, calls out "done" when no test ran, keeps large tool output small, triages async subagent reports, and holds the rare destructive command.
These tools work well together with pi-warden for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a pi-warden alternative? If you're comparing pi-warden with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
TypeSafe Jev as a decision layer for the Pi coding agent: a measured tool-call gate plus jev_ask for typed, ca
Deterministic safety solutions for probabilistic AI agents
Run Cursor's agent loop inside the pi coding agent via local Cursor SDK agents, with native model selection, t
pi extension that exposes agent-browser as a native tool for browser automation
Codex-style goal tracking and continuation for pi.
Stops AI coding agents from claiming work is done without evidence. Deterministic hooks decide, TypeSafe's Jev
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: