by Eronred · MCP Server · ★ 7
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Featured in: AI Design Tools
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 7 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-02 |
| Created | 2026-10-31 |
| Platforms | mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
Keep AI-written UI on your design system: a spec of your tokens and components that coding agents follow and CI enforces.
Looking for a designspec alternative? If you're comparing designspec with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The design layer for agentic AI — design context, interface checks, and verification for coding agents.
Stop Claude Code/Cursor from guessing UI. Extract any website's design system into a spec-valid DESIGN.md that
Desktop app for multi-workspace Claude Code management
On-demand design systems from any URL. Five surfaces, one agent: web, API, CLI, TypeScript SDK, and a portable
A Claude skill that audits designs against 19 professional design rules.
🚇 A plugin-based MCP server for React Native runtime debugging, inspection, and automation. Connects to Metro
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: