by EthanYolo01 · MCP Server · ★ 156
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 156 |
| Forks | 32 |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Open Issues | 20 |
| Last Updated | 2026-03-20 |
| Created | 2026-03-19 |
| Platforms | mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~7k |
🦞 Awesome OpenClaw A carefully curated list of awesome OpenClaw resources — not everything, just the best. Skills · Plugins · MCP · Tools · Deployments · Security · Research · Alternatives Opinionated curation over exhaustive listing. Every entry was reviewed. Where other lists stop at a URL, we tell you why it matters and when to use it. OpenClaw at a G
Looking for a Awesome-OpenClaw alternative? If you're comparing Awesome-OpenClaw with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A curated list of tools, papers, and datasets for applying AI to cybersecurity tasks. This list primarily focu
The definitive resource for Agent Skills - modular capabilities revolutionizing AI agent architecture
A curated list of awesome tools, extensions, and resources for Gemini CLI.
🔌 A curated list of OSINT MCP servers. Pull requests are welcomed!
🦞 Research-oriented collection of papers, analyses & resources on the OpenClaw ecosystem
A curated list of resources, tools, papers, and platforms for prompt engineering in large language models (LLM
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: