visual-presentation-production: what it is & alternatives

by FW1201 · Codex Skill · ★ 33

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is visual-presentation-production safe to install? View the security audit →

About visual-presentation-production

Portable 16:9 image presentation production skill for Codex and ChatGPT Work

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 50/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

Quick Facts

Stars33
Forks7
LanguagePython
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score50.1648437894254/100
Last Updated2026-09-05
Created2026-07-12
Platformscodex, python
Est. Tokens~3k

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is visual-presentation-production?

visual-presentation-production is Portable 16:9 image presentation production skill for Codex and ChatGPT Work. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 33 GitHub stars.

What programming language is visual-presentation-production written in?

visual-presentation-production is primarily written in Python.

How do I install or use visual-presentation-production?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the visual-presentation-production GitHub repository at github.com/FW1201/visual-presentation-production. The project has 33 stars and 7 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does visual-presentation-production use?

visual-presentation-production is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools