failproofai — security grade SAFE, quality 64/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 64/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by FailproofAI · Codex Skill · ★ 5.1k

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is failproofai safe to install? View the security audit →

About failproofai

Translations: 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Español · Português · Deutsch · Français · Русский · हिन्दी · Türkçe · Tiếng Việt · [Italiano](./docs/i18n/README.it.m

agent-failureagent-harnessagent-observabilityagent-reliabilityagent-tracingai-agentclaude-codecodexenforcementevals

Quick Facts

Stars5,121
Forks497
LanguageMDX
CategoryCodex Skill
Quality Score64.4482646289973/100
Open Issues39
Last Updated2026-09-22
Created2026-04-06
Platformsclaude-code, codex
Est. Tokens~17k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with failproofai for enhanced workflows:

  • failproofai — semantic(1.00)+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (70%)
  • octogent — semantic(0.19)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (61%)
  • pi-mcp-adapter — semantic(0.24)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (59%)
  • claw-orchestrator — semantic(0.21)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (57%)
  • code-container — semantic(0.20)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (57%)

failproofai alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a failproofai alternative? If you're comparing failproofai with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • holaOS by holaboss-ai · ⭐ 10.6k

    Open-source agentic workspace enterprises can make their own. Connect the systems you already run — 100+ integ

  • ai-guide by liyupi · ⭐ 19.8k

    程序员鱼皮的 AI 资源大全 + Vibe Coding 零基础教程,分享 OpenClaw 保姆级教程、大模型玩法(DeepSeek / GPT / Gemini / Claude / GLM)、最新 AI 资讯、Pr

  • mission-control by builderz-labs · ⭐ 6.3k

    Self-hosted control plane for AI agents: dispatch tasks, review runs, track spend, and operate OpenClaw, Claud

  • tokscale by junhoyeo · ⭐ 5.5k

    🛰️ Track token usage across AI coding agents from your terminal. 🏅 Global leaderboard with trillions of toke

  • logfire by pydantic · ⭐ 4.5k

    AI observability platform for production LLM and agent systems.

  • awesome-openclaw-usecases-zh by AlexAnys · ⭐ 4.4k

    🇨🇳 OpenClaw中文用例大全 | 50个真实场景 | 国内特色 + 海外案例的国内适配 | 自动化办公·内容创作·运维·AI助理·知识管理 | 新手友好

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular MDX Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is failproofai?

failproofai is Observability and enforcement for AI agent harnesses. Capture every run and runtime reliability with policy enforcement.. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 5.1k GitHub stars.

What programming language is failproofai written in?

failproofai is primarily written in MDX. It covers topics such as agent-failure, agent-harness, agent-observability.

How do I install or use failproofai?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the failproofai GitHub repository at github.com/FailproofAI/failproofai. The project has 5.1k stars and 497 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to failproofai?

The top alternatives to failproofai on Agent Skills Hub include holaOS, ai-guide, mission-control. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools