by ForkPoint · MCP Server · ★ 17
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 17 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-22 |
| Created | 2026-08-17 |
| Platforms | browser, cli, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
Lighthouse-style audits for AI agents, LLM crawlers, MCP clients, and the agentic web.
Looking for a agent-lighthouse alternative? If you're comparing agent-lighthouse with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Claude Code plugin that tells you why your site won't get cited by AI — and fixes the discoverability files au
Give any AI agent a crypto wallet. Agents deserve access to money. Pay x402 APIs, receive USDC, check balance
Six-tool MCP server for Google PageSpeed Insights & Chrome UX Report APIs. Analyze, compare, and optimize web
ToolRegistry: A Protocol-Agnostic Tool Management Library for Function-Calling LLMs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini
Open-source marketing harness for Claude Code and Codex: skills for SEO, content, email, ads, launches, CRO an
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: