bibverify — security grade SAFE, quality 78/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 78/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by Hylouis233 · MCP Server · ★ 101

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is bibverify safe to install? View the security audit →

About bibverify

Bibverify Verify bibliographic existence and metadata consistency without destructive edits. Chinese · Install · Quick start · MCP · Development Bibverify is a BibTeX metadata verification tool for researchers, editors, automation, and AI assistants. It starts with exact DOI, PMID, PMCID, or arXiv identifiers and then scores candidates from title, author, year, venue, and pagination evidence. Bibverify evaluates whether a bibliographic record can be located in the queried sources and whether its metadata agrees. It does not prove that research findings are true, data is authentic, or a venue is reputable. A missing database record is not evidence that a referen

bibliographybibtexcitation-verificationclicross-platformcrossrefmcp-servermodel-context-protocolopenalexpython

Quick Facts

Stars101
Forks0
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score77.7824471640812/100
Last Updated2026-09-11
Created2025-10-11
Platformscli, mcp, python
Est. Tokens~17k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with bibverify for enhanced workflows:

  • OneCite — semantic(0.28)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (73%)
  • chinese-reference-formatter-skill — semantic(0.21)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (66%)

bibverify alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a bibverify alternative? If you're comparing bibverify with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • cli-anything-zotero by PiaoyangGuohai1 · ⭐ 122

    CLI server for Zotero 7/8/9 — let AI manage your library. 70+ CLI commands for search, import, PDF, BibTeX, no

  • OneCite by HzaCode · ⭐ 64

    📚 Only Cite what you can verify

  • openevidence-mcp by htlin222 · ⭐ 71

    Unofficial OpenEvidence MCP server — query OpenEvidence from Claude Code, Codex, and any MCP client through yo

  • web-researcher-mcp by zoharbabin · ⭐ 56

    Give your AI assistant real web search, full-page reading, and multi-source research with citations that are n

  • flutter-skill by ai-dashboad · ⭐ 362

    AI-powered E2E testing for 10 platforms. 253 MCP tools. Zero config. Works with Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, Copi

  • nature-academic-search by wp-a · ⭐ 221

    Academic Paper Search:中文科研用户的 Codex / Claude Code / DeepSeek Harness Skill + MCP;跨 CrossRef、PubMed、arXiv、OpenA

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is bibverify?

bibverify is Cross-platform BibTeX verification for researchers and AI assistants — CLI, Python API, MCP server, and explainable multi-source matching.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 101 GitHub stars.

What programming language is bibverify written in?

bibverify is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as bibliography, bibtex, citation-verification.

How do I install or use bibverify?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the bibverify GitHub repository at github.com/Hylouis233/bibverify. The project has 101 stars and 0 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does bibverify use?

bibverify is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to bibverify?

The top alternatives to bibverify on Agent Skills Hub include cli-anything-zotero, OneCite, openevidence-mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools