by IT-Shelter-Labs · Agent Tool · ★ 24
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 24 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-04 |
| Created | 2026-10-04 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
AI-assisted text editor for Windows with local LLM support, text rewriting, style improvement and Unicode cleanup.
Looking for a Shelter-Humanizer alternative? If you're comparing Shelter-Humanizer with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Transform AI-generated text into natural human-like content. 100% offline · 25 languages · Zero dependencies ·
AI humanizer skill for Claude Code, Codex and Cursor. Removes AI slop and the signs of AI writing, then measur
Extend the Ollama API with dynamic AI tool integration from multiple MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers. Ful
LLM-powered Agent Runtime with Dynamic DAG Planning & Concurrent Execution
AI-powered text compression library for RAG systems and API calls. Reduce token usage by up to 50-60% while pr
Cutting-edge AI solution for Home Assistant. Multi-LLM provider support to transform your smart home experienc
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: