by KeyValueSoftwareSystems · MCP Server · ★ 584
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npm install -g @keyvaluesystems/agent-opfor-cliTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 584 |
| Forks | 33 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 69/100 |
| Open Issues | 56 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-31 |
| Created | 2026-04-06 |
| Platforms | browser, cli, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
Open-source adversary emulation for AI agents, LLM apps, and MCP servers. Test your AI like a real attacker would — from your CLI, your IDE, or a browser extension that anyone on your team can use. Website · Docs ·
Looking for a agent-opfor alternative? If you're comparing agent-opfor with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A security scanner for your LLM agentic workflows
The AI Agent for Cyber Security.
Security toolkit for AI agents. Scan your machine for dangerous skills and MCP configs, monitor for supply cha
A curated list of MLSecOps tools and resources for securing machine learning and AI systems - adversarial ML d
SecureClaw - Security Plugin and Skill for OpenClaw OWASP-Aligned
Open-source AI security verification for model artifacts, live endpoints, MCP servers, and recorded agent trac
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: