by KyrieZhang329 · Codex Skill · ★ 68
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
English · 简体中文 · Project Rules · Initial Prompt · 📧 Contact [!NOTE] Update — this is now an assistant, not an autopilot. The earlier version ran the whole contest end to end and left the user only clicking "confirm", which is closer to ghost-writing: it does not fit most contests' rules, and it does little for your own skills. This version hands the key judgments back to the user — the AI returns to a supporting role, and you stay in charge. The skill count went from 24 to 28. The previous full-auto version is kept intact on the branch; switch to it if you prefer the old behavior. A set of skills for math-modeling contests, built around the mistakes that tend to cost the most time. They sit behind a set of hard gates — two of which
| Stars | 68 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 57.8624909588063/100 |
| Open Issues | 3 |
| Last Updated | 2026-05-25 |
| Created | 2026-04-26 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex |
| Est. Tokens | ~33k |
These tools work well together with MathModeling-skills for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a MathModeling-skills alternative? If you're comparing MathModeling-skills with other codex skill tools, these 2 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
MathModeling-skills is 面向数学建模竞赛的 Claude Code / Codex Skills ，支持分阶段建模流程与 Python、MATLAB/北太天元代码分支。. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 68 GitHub stars.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the MathModeling-skills GitHub repository at github.com/KyrieZhang329/MathModeling-skills. The project has 68 stars and 3 forks, indicating an active community.
MathModeling-skills is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to MathModeling-skills on Agent Skills Hub include theorist, schematic. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.