jevtok: Exact token counting and request-cost prediction for TypeSafe's Jev (tiktoken-style)

by LabGuy94 · LLM Plugin · ★ 5

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 64/100

None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.

The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.

jevllmtiktokentokenizertypesafe

Quick Facts

Stars5
Forks0
LanguagePython
CategoryLLM Plugin
LicenseMIT
Quality Score64/100
Last Updated2026-09-21
Created2026-09-21
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~14k

About jevtok

Exact token counting and request-cost prediction for TypeSafe's Jev (tiktoken-style)

jevtok alternative? Top 5 similar tools

Looking for a jevtok alternative? If you're comparing jevtok with other llm plugin tools, these 5 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • HA-Jev by AboveColin · ⭐ 84

    Ask your house a question, get a number back. Home Assistant integration for TypeSafe Jev: typed answers as se

  • awesome-jev by OmniJev · ⭐ 65

    🔥🔥 Papers, open reproductions and independent evaluations behind System One models and Jev.

  • Canny by qkal · ⭐ 50

    Stops AI coding agents from claiming work is done without evidence. Deterministic hooks decide, TypeSafe's Jev

  • limboo by limboo-ai · ⭐ 92

    An Orchestrate multiple coding agent desktop app

  • limboo by BotCoder254 · ⭐ 73

    An Orchestrate multiple coding agent desktop app

More LLM Plugin Tools

Explore other popular llm plugin tools:

View all LLM Plugin tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse LLM Plugin tools