by Luzikov · MCP Server · ★ 0
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 0 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 55/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-03-26 |
| Created | 2026-03-26 |
| Platforms | browser, codex, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~2k |
SEO audit skill for Codex with technical SEO, schema, AI search, and Next.js codebase review.
Looking for a codex-seo-skill alternative? If you're comparing codex-seo-skill with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Agent skills for squirrelscan, the website QA tool for your coding agent (300+ audit rules).
SEO Landing: Give your AI coding agent the capabilities of a senior Technical SEO engineer. An agent skill fo
Headless MCP server for Screaming Frog SEO Spider – run crawls, export and analyze crawl data via the CLI. Sma
Six-tool MCP server for Google PageSpeed Insights & Chrome UX Report APIs. Analyze, compare, and optimize web
Claude Code plugin that tells you why your site won't get cited by AI — and fixes the discoverability files au
The definitive SEO + GEO skill for Claude. Full site audits with scored findings, AI search optimization (Goog
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: