archex — security grade SAFE, quality 62/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 62/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by Mathews-Tom · MCP Server · ★ 66

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is archex safe to install? View the security audit →

About archex

archex Verified local code context for agents. AI coding agents usually start by opening a file, following an import, checking a type definition, and backtracking through the repo until the context window is partly spent before the real task starts. archex does that retrieval and structural expansion up front and returns a ranked, token-budgeted context bundle plus a receipt that records what was included, what was skipped, and whether the bundle is complete enough to act on. It runs locally, uses deterministic retrieval and analysis, and does not require hosted inference or an API key. The v0.13 line adds stronger benchmark trust surfaces, bundle-only evaluator support, and default 4-bit TurboQuant vector storage for local vector indexes. Start: 30-second quickstart · MCP and Claude Code · Python API · Local metrics · Compatibility matrix · [Installation trust con

agentsarchexastcode-intelligencecode-retrievalcode-searchcoding-agentscontext-engineeringcontext-window-optimizationdeveloper-tools

Quick Facts

Stars66
Forks6
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score61.7327574412185/100
Last Updated2026-10-04
Created2026-02-27
Platformsmcp, python
Est. Tokens~19k

archex alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a archex alternative? If you're comparing archex with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • leantoken by morluto · ⭐ 65

    Code intelligence for agents: find the code that matters and keep your context window and tokens lean.

  • srclight by srclight · ⭐ 57

    Deep code indexing MCP server for AI agents. 25 tools: hybrid FTS5 + embedding search, call graphs, git blame/

  • codebase-context by PatrickSys · ⭐ 65

    Codebase Context gives AI agents understanding of your codebase through semantic code search, team conventions

  • Vera by lemon07r · ⭐ 102

    Local code search combining BM25, vector similarity, and cross-encoder reranking. Parses 60+ languages with tr

  • tree-sitter-analyzer by aimasteracc · ⭐ 52

    Cross-language-safe code-intelligence MCP for AI agents: 13 languages, family-gated call graph, blast radius,

  • mcp-server-tree-sitter by wrale · ⭐ 309

    MCP Server for Tree-sitter

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is archex?

archex is Verified code context for agents. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 66 GitHub stars.

What programming language is archex written in?

archex is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agents, archex, ast.

How do I install or use archex?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the archex GitHub repository at github.com/Mathews-Tom/archex. The project has 66 stars and 6 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does archex use?

archex is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to archex?

The top alternatives to archex on Agent Skills Hub include leantoken, srclight, codebase-context. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools