by MaxHan7 · Codex Skill · ★ 106
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/MaxHan7/frontend-ui-standards-skill.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 106 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-06-27 |
| Created | 2026-06-27 |
| Platforms | codex |
| Est. Tokens | ~1k |
Frontend UI Standards Skill A Codex skill for implementing, refactoring, and reviewing frontend UI with design-system discipline. It helps agents avoid common UI implementation drift: scattered hardcoded values one-off layout patches duplicated button/card/chip implementations typography and spacing inconsistency Figma-to-code copies that ignore reusable components mobile safe-area and...
Looking for a frontend-ui-standards-skill alternative? If you're comparing frontend-ui-standards-skill with other codex skill tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A Codex/Claude skill that maintains per-repo operating theory documents.
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: