by Moviw · Codex Skill · ★ 16
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 16 |
| Forks | 4 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 74/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-07 |
| Created | 2026-09-30 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
Status bar for Codex CLI and Claude Code: context, 5h/weekly quota with reset times, tokens.
Looking for a codex-statusline alternative? If you're comparing codex-statusline with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A k9s-inspired CLI and TUI for managing Claude Code sessions — browse, search, inspect, and clean up your AI c
htop for your AI costs — real-time terminal monitoring of LLM token usage and spending across providers and co
Process manager for AI agents (and humans)
Supercharge your Claude Code CLI experience with a powerful statusline that displays key session metrics (Git
Local-first Windows tray app for monitoring Claude Code and Codex tokens, costs, sessions, and rate limits
Know your quota before you hit the wall. The only pace-aware statusline for Claude Code.
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: