by Nayjest · MCP Server · ★ 108
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
pip install ai-microcoreTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 108 |
| Forks | 8 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Open Issues | 32 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-20 |
| Created | 2023-06-29 |
| Platforms | mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
AI MicroCore: A Minimalistic Foundation for AI Applications MicroCore is a
Looking for a ai-microcore alternative? If you're comparing ai-microcore with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Python version of 📦 repopack (https://github.com/yamadashy/repopack) by yamadashy (https://github.com/yamadas
AI-powered text compression library for RAG systems and API calls. Reduce token usage by up to 50-60% while pr
An example agent demonstrating streaming, tool use, and interactivity from your terminal. This agent builder c
Build, Improve Performance, and Productionize your LLM Application with an Integrated Framework
A minimal yet powerful framework for creating AI agents with full control over tools, providers, and execution
Python library for building with LLMs. One interface across 11 providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, DeepSeek,
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: