by Pigyon · MCP Server · ★ 56
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/nedlir/mcpwner.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 56 |
| Forks | 8 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 62/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-20 |
| Created | 2026-01-23 |
| Platforms | mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
MCPwner Beware the Badger Model Context Protocol server for security research automation Compatible with: Overview MCPwner is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that integrates security testing tools into LLM-driven workflows. It provides a unified interface for secret scanning, static analysis (SAST), software composition analysis (SCA), infra
These tools work well together with MCPwner for enhanced workflows:
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: