by Puliczek · MCP Server · ★ 738
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 738 |
| Forks | 251 |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 51/100 |
| Open Issues | 213 |
| Last Updated | 2026-03-03 |
| Created | 2025-04-08 |
| Platforms | cli, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~10k |
🤝 Show your support - give a ⭐️ if you liked the content Awesome MCP Security Everything you need to know about Model Context Protocol (MCP) security. Table of Contents Awesome MCP Security 📔 Security Considerations 📃 Papers 📺 Videos 📕 Articles, X threads and Blog Posts 🧑🚀 Tools and code 💾 MCP Security Servers 💻 Other Useful Resources 📔 Security Considerations Official Security...
Looking for a awesome-mcp-security alternative? If you're comparing awesome-mcp-security with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Plugin for JADX to integrate MCP server
MCP Router — development, support and security updates ended 2026-09-18. Historical source and final release f
An MCP client for Neovim that seamlessly integrates MCP servers into your editing workflow with an intuitive i
Connect Cursor, Copilot & Claude AI directly to Cheat Engine via MCP. Automate reverse engineering, pointer sc
A curated collection of top-tier penetration testing tools and productivity utilities across multiple domains.
MCP configuration to connect AI agent to a Linux machine.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: