by PyModel · MCP Server · ★ 48
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 48 |
| Forks | 5 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-20 |
| Created | 2026-09-23 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
Typed judgment tools for MCP agents. TypeSafe's Jev model as verify, screen, find, classify, rerank, decide, compare, extract, review, gate, and score: the model judges, policy decides auto, review, or escalate.
These tools work well together with jev-judge-mcp for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a jev-judge-mcp alternative? If you're comparing jev-judge-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Give your AI assistant real web search, full-page reading, and multi-source research with citations that are n
The World's Most Comprehensive, Authoritative, and Structured Open Source Data Source Knowledge Base
📜 An MCP server for conversation history search and retrieval in Claude Code
Open-source MCP gateway and control plane for teams to govern which tools agents can use, what they can do, an
An MCP Server for Ollama
🤖 Taskade MCP · Official MCP server and OpenAPI to MCP codegen. Build AI agent tools from any OpenAPI API and
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: