by ScottRBK · MCP Server · ★ 338
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
uvx forgetful-ai
uv tool install forgetful-aiTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 338 |
| Forks | 35 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Open Issues | 16 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-07 |
| Created | 2025-10-20 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
Forgetful Forgetful is a storage and retrieval tool for AI Agents. Designed as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server built using the FastMCP framework. Once connected to this service, MCP clients such as Coding Agents, Chat Bots or your own custom built Agents can store and retrieve information from the same knowledge base.
Looking for a forgetful alternative? If you're comparing forgetful with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The control plane for AI coding agents.
Persistent memory for AI coding agents
Self-hosted mem0 MCP server for Claude Code. Run a complete memory server against self-hosted Qdrant + Neo4j +
A lightweight persistent-memory companion for OpenCode & Claude
A lightweight, rollbackable, and visual Long-Term Memory Server for MCP Agents. Say goodbye to Vector RAG and
AI Agent Orchestrator with Skills System - Give AI Agents superpowers: memory search, code graph queries, agen
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: