by ShalomObongo · MCP Server · ★ 7
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 7 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-22 |
| Created | 2026-09-23 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, gemini, mcp, node, vscode |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
Codex's image generation in every coding agent: an MCP server + Agent Skill with a one-command installer for opencode, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Gemini CLI and 20 more tools. Runs on your ChatGPT plan with no API key.
Looking for a codex-imagegen-mcp alternative? If you're comparing codex-imagegen-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
One command installs 670+ security tools on Debian/Ubuntu/Kali, Fedora, Arch, openSUSE and Termux. Its authori
Local citation-backed recall for Pi, OMP, Claude Code, Codex, and ChatGPT history.
A light-weight and straightforward workflow for spec-driven development with Claude Code and Codex. Written in
List MCP Server configurations in your system used by AI applications like Cursor, Claude Desktop, VS Code and
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: