by Shantodotdev · MCP Server · ★ 6
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 6 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-08 |
| Created | 2026-09-06 |
| Platforms | browser, cli, mcp, rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~24k |
Blazingly fast, local-first website crawler and 120-rule technical SEO audit engine with native MCP support.
Looking for a blacksparrow alternative? If you're comparing blacksparrow with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Agent skills for squirrelscan, the website QA tool for your coding agent (300+ audit rules).
Local-first AI knowledge layer. Extract architecture, query from any AI tool via MCP. Private by architecture.
Headless MCP server for Screaming Frog SEO Spider – run crawls, export and analyze crawl data via the CLI. Sma
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Local-first AI memory archive. Import ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok exports, generate semantic embeddings, and sea
AI coding runtime hygiene for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, MCP servers, and safe workspace caches. Tr
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: