by SkeneTechnologies · MCP Server · ★ 121
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
uvx skene analyse-journey .
pip install skeneTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 121 |
| Forks | 13 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Open Issues | 10 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-26 |
| Created | 2026-01-07 |
| Platforms | cli, gemini, go, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
Skene reads your codebase and produces a user journey for your product: the lifecycle stages a user moves through, the milestones inside each stage, and the code or database evidence that proves each milestone is real.
Looking for a skene alternative? If you're comparing skene with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A transparent, minimal, and hackable agent framework. ~300 lines of readable code. Full control, no magic.
Python library for building with LLMs. One interface across 11 providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, DeepSeek,
MCP Fusion - The framework for AI-native MCP servers.
📜 An MCP server for conversation history search and retrieval in Claude Code
File Storage & Sandbox Backends for Pydantic AI: console tools for file operations, Docker-isolated sandboxes
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: