by SponsioLabs · MCP Server · ★ 455
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
pip install sponsio # or: npm install -D @sponsio/sdk
Taken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 455 |
| Forks | 27 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-26 |
| Created | 2026-04-04 |
| Platforms | mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
English · 简体中文 · 日本語 <img...
These tools work well together with Sponsio for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a Sponsio alternative? If you're comparing Sponsio with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Open-source firewall for AI agents. Policy engine that audits and controls what OpenClaw, Claude Code, Cursor,
Open-source self-hosted AI agent runtime and multi-agent framework for autonomous agent swarms. Agent memory,
A collection of AI agent skills for Clawdbot, Claude Code, Codex
🟪 Open-source runtime that ships any LangGraph or Google ADK agent as a production-ready FastAPI service. Bun
Security toolkit for AI agents. Scan your machine for dangerous skills and MCP configs, monitor for supply cha
Curated awesome list for OpenClaw (formerly Moltbot/Clawdbot): skills, plugins, memory systems, MCP tools, dep
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: