im-not-ai-codex: Codex plugin port of epoko77-ai/im-not-ai for Korean AI-tell rewriting

by Squirbie · Codex Skill · ★ 71

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 59/100

None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.

Quick Facts

Stars71
Forks4
LanguagePython
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score59/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-05-08
Created2026-04-25
Platformscodex, python
Est. Tokens~16k

About im-not-ai-codex

Humanize KR for Codex — 한글 AI 티 제거기 v2.0.0 epoko77-ai/im-not-ai의 Codex 플러그인 포트입니다. 원본 공식 repo의 기준으로 만들었고, 한국 번역학계 8유형 기반 taxonomy 보강과 post-editese metric layer까지 반영했습니다. AI(ChatGPT · Claude · Gemini 등)가 쓴 한글 글을 내용은 한 글자도 건드리지 않고 문체 · 리듬 · 표현만 자연스러운 한국어로 되돌리는 Codex plugin/skill입니다.

im-not-ai-codex alternative? Top 1 similar tools

Looking for a im-not-ai-codex alternative? If you're comparing im-not-ai-codex with other codex skill tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • theorist by blader · ⭐ 191

    A Codex/Claude skill that maintains per-repo operating theory documents.

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools