No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by TianyiDataScience · Codex Skill · ★ 4.0k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is openclaw-control-center safe to install? View the security audit →
Chinese reader? Start here: 打开中文 README OpenClaw Control Center Turn OpenClaw from a black box into a local control center you can see, trust, and control. Language: English | 中文 Why this exists One local place to see whether OpenClaw is healthy, busy, blocked, or drifting. Built for non-technical operators who need observability and certainty, not raw backend payloads. Safe first-run defaults: read-only by default local token auth by default mutation routes disabled by default What you get : health, current state, decisions waiting, and operator-facing summaries : usage, spend, subscription windows, and connector status : who is really working now versus only queued : a hall-first multi-agent work chat with live discussion, execution order, handoff, review, and evidence threads : current work, approvals, execution chains, and runtime evidence and : source-backed workbenches scoped to active OpenClaw agents What this release adds : a new hall-first collaboration page so you can post work in one shared timeline, see real agent roster names reply live, and watch discussion collapse into one execution owner before review. : hall discussion, assign, and handoff can now dispatch
| Stars | 3,993 |
| Forks | 619 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 59.9489869413105/100 |
| Open Issues | 38 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-13 |
| Created | 2026-03-11 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
These tools work well together with openclaw-control-center for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a openclaw-control-center alternative? If you're comparing openclaw-control-center with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Superset is an agentic IDE to orchestrate 100+ coding agents in parallel. Run any agent with your own subscrip
The first open-source agent skills builder. Define skills by vibe workflow, run on Claude Code, Cursor, Codex
Bridge Claude Code / Codex to IM platforms — chat with AI coding agents from Telegram, Discord, or Feishu/Lark
📚 Sync skills across all AI CLI tools with one command and simplify team sharing. Supporting Codex, Claude Co
Skills for pi coding agent (compatible with Claude Code and Codex CLI)
Build tested agent skills and govern their lifecycle through a user-defined marketplace: evidence, discovery,
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
openclaw-control-center is Turn OpenClaw from a black box into a local control center you can see, trust, and control.. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 4.0k GitHub stars.
openclaw-control-center is primarily written in TypeScript.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the openclaw-control-center GitHub repository at github.com/TianyiDataScience/openclaw-control-center. The project has 4.0k stars and 619 forks, indicating an active community.
openclaw-control-center is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to openclaw-control-center on Agent Skills Hub include superset, refly, Claude-to-IM-skill. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: