TuriX-CUA — security grade SAFE, quality 65/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 65/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by TurixAI · MCP Server · ★ 3.2k

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is TuriX-CUA safe to install? View the security audit →

About TuriX-CUA

TuriX · Desktop Actions, Driven by AI Talk to your computer, watch it work. English | 中文 📞 Contact & Community Join our Discord community for support, discussions, and updates: Or contact us with email: contact@turix.ai TuriX lets your powerful AI models take real, hands‑on actions directly on your desktop. It ships with a state‑of‑the‑art computer‑use agent (achieves 80% success rate on our OSWorld‑style Mac benchmark and 64.2% success rate on OSWorld) yet stays 100 % open‑source and cost‑free for personal & research use. Prefer your own model? Change in and go. Table of Contents 📞 Contact & Community 🤖 OpenClaw Skill 📰 Latest News 🖼️ Demos ✨ Key Features 📊 Model Performance 🚀 Quick‑Start (macOS 15+) Download the App [2. Create a Python 3.12 Environment](#2-cre

agentai-agentsbrowser-usecomputer-automationcomputer-usecomputer-use-agentcuagui-agentgui-operatormcp

Quick Facts

Stars3,161
Forks328
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score65.1854709030341/100
Open Issues2
Last Updated2026-09-14
Created2025-08-04
Platformsbrowser, mcp, python
Est. Tokens~17k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with TuriX-CUA for enhanced workflows:

  • os-ai-computer-use — semantic(0.54)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+shared_platform (67%)
  • open-computer-use — semantic(0.50)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (67%)
  • mac_computer_use — semantic(0.50)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (67%)

TuriX-CUA alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a TuriX-CUA alternative? If you're comparing TuriX-CUA with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • bytebot by bytebot-ai · ⭐ 11.1k

    Bytebot is a self-hosted AI desktop agent that automates computer tasks through natural language commands, ope

  • open-codex-computer-use by iFurySt · ⭐ 2.2k

    👾 Open Computer Use – Open-Source Alternative to Codex Computer Use

  • agent-desktop by lahfir · ⭐ 1.5k

    Agent Desktop gives any agent reliable computer use on the desktop. Built with Rust, it sees any app's real UI

  • open-computer-use by coasty-ai · ⭐ 763

    State of the Art 82% OSWorld Computer Using Agent, production-ready. Remote and Local! Setup using one API Key

  • midscene by web-infra-dev · ⭐ 15.0k

    GUI Agent for E2E Testing

  • nanobrowser by nanobrowser · ⭐ 13.6k

    Open-Source Chrome extension for AI-powered web automation. Run multi-agent workflows using your own LLM API k

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is TuriX-CUA?

TuriX-CUA is This is the official website for TuriX Computer-use-Agent. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 3.2k GitHub stars.

What programming language is TuriX-CUA written in?

TuriX-CUA is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent, ai-agents, browser-use.

How do I install or use TuriX-CUA?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the TuriX-CUA GitHub repository at github.com/TurixAI/TuriX-CUA. The project has 3.2k stars and 328 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does TuriX-CUA use?

TuriX-CUA is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to TuriX-CUA?

The top alternatives to TuriX-CUA on Agent Skills Hub include bytebot, open-codex-computer-use, agent-desktop. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools