by ZASENJC · Agent Tool · ★ 72
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 72 |
| Forks | 6 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Open Issues | 6 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-22 |
| Created | 2026-08-13 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
<a href="https://www.nodeseek.com/" aria-label="访问
These tools work well together with dsh-plugins-store for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a dsh-plugins-store alternative? If you're comparing dsh-plugins-store with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
900 arXiv-verified 3DGS methods · 15 AI agent skills · MCP server (34 tools) · open ebook — the AI-native entr
Your Intelligence, Orchestrated. Any Model, Any Agent, Any One.
Composable mathematics tools for agents
PawWork — free, open-source desktop AI agent for macOS and Windows, built on DeepSeek Harness (DSH). Free mode
A portable memory protocol for AI agents — load it as standing rules; a curation discipline + reference spec +
A CLI that turns a goal into a pull request - and a sandbox for testing concurrent AI coding agents on the Moz
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: