by ZeroDayEvil · MCP Server · ★ 1.3k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 1,333 |
| Forks | 232 |
| Language | HTML |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 57/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-04 |
| Created | 2026-09-10 |
| Platforms | browser, cli, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~20k |
AI Security Tool Cross-Platform AI-Native Terminal & Supply Chain Scanner Next-Gen AI Security Ecosystem, Multi-Protocol Terminal & Autonomous Agent Suite <img src="https://img.shie
These tools work well together with ai-security-tool for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a ai-security-tool alternative? If you're comparing ai-security-tool with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Open-source AI-augmented offensive security harness. 13+ autonomous agents, 150+ LLM providers, 5,300+ models,
Open-source autonomous AI penetration testing. 50 specialist agents across web, API, cloud, Active Directory,
A security scanner for your LLM agentic workflows
Super-tool for vibe coders & system admins — terminals, SSH, SFTP, RDP/VNC, dashboards, install helpers, and a
Open source agentic SAST. The engine behind hundreds of disclosed zero-days. 100+ AI security agents, any repo
AI-powered bug bounty hunting toolkit that works with or without subscription.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: