by Zuehlke · MCP Server · ★ 107
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
claude plugin install labview-mcp@zuehlke-labview
claude mcp add labview -- C:\Projects\LabVIEWMCP\src\LabVIEWMCP\bin\Debug\net8.0\LabVIEWMCP.exeTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 107 |
| Forks | 29 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-04 |
| Created | 2026-08-04 |
| Platforms | mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~25k |
## 🧪 Read this before you let a robot touch your VIs Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or supported by NI or Emerson. Nobody at NI asked for this, nobody at NI owes you anything for it, and nobody at NI is on the hook when it misbehaves. The plumbing is theirs, and it is public. The server inside LabVIEW is ni/grpc-labview, NI's own open source, MIT licensed gRPC stack.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: