by adityajha2005 · MCP Server · ★ 6
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 6 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-10 |
| Created | 2026-10-10 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
Fast, cheap, probability-scored decisions for coding agents, scripts and CI. CLI + MCP server + Claude Code plugin for the OpenAI Decisions API and Jev (TypeSafe AI).
Looking for a decisionkit alternative? If you're comparing decisionkit with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
Automatic context preservation for Claude Code. Never lose work to compaction again. 7 hooks, 187 semantic pat
Agent Skills and a Claude Code plugin for building, testing, and shipping voice agents with LiveKit
CLI-first MCP server for composer-based Kirby CMS projects — inspect blueprints/templates/plugins, interact wi
Automated loop driver, slash commands, council automation, MCP browser bridge, and portfolio governance for Cl
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: