fastbrowse — security grade SAFE, quality 65/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 65/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by agent-labs-dev · LLM Plugin · ★ 113

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is fastbrowse safe to install? View the security audit →

About fastbrowse

A browser agent that picks instead of generating. Jev chooses each action, an LLM plans and reads, and code owns verification, safety and secrets. Why Most browser agents generate each action from a screenshot. fastbrowse indexes the page into candidates and has Jev, a choice model, pick one, so it cannot click something that was never on the page. Every claim in an answer cites a verbatim quote from the page. Against Browser Use The same 14 answer tasks (lookups, sign-ins, checkout, Google Flights), three passes each, on the same cloud browser with the same limits (30 steps, $0.25, 300s): Every one of Browser Use's 28 failures ran past the $

agentsbrowser-agentllmpythonweb-automation

Quick Facts

Stars113
Forks14
LanguagePython
CategoryLLM Plugin
LicenseMIT
Quality Score64.9101623464305/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-10-03
Created2026-09-17
Platformsbrowser, python
Est. Tokens~16k

fastbrowse alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a fastbrowse alternative? If you're comparing fastbrowse with other llm plugin tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • concierge by concierge-hq · ⭐ 531

    🚀 Universal SDK for building next-gen MCP servers

  • web-agent-protocol by OTA-Tech-AI · ⭐ 509

    🌐Web Agent Protocol (WAP) - Record and replay user interactions in the browser with MCP support

  • atlas-mcp-server by cyanheads · ⭐ 478

    A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for ATLAS, a Neo4j-powered task management system for LLM Agents - imple

  • bux by browser-use · ⭐ 419

    Browser Use Box: a 24/7 Claude Code agent for Playwright-style browser automation with Browser Use Cloud, Tele

  • mcp by IBM · ⭐ 409

    A collection of Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, clients and developer tools by IBM.

  • mcp-server-code-execution-mode by elusznik · ⭐ 337

    An MCP server that executes Python code in isolated rootless containers with optional MCP server proxying. Imp

More LLM Plugin Tools

Explore other popular llm plugin tools:

View all LLM Plugin tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is fastbrowse?

fastbrowse is A fast browser agent: Jev picks each action from what is on the page, an LLM reads and plans, and every claim in an answer cites a quote from the page.. It is categorized as a LLM Plugin with 113 GitHub stars.

What programming language is fastbrowse written in?

fastbrowse is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agents, browser-agent, llm.

How do I install or use fastbrowse?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the fastbrowse GitHub repository at github.com/agent-labs-dev/fastbrowse. The project has 113 stars and 14 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does fastbrowse use?

fastbrowse is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to fastbrowse?

The top alternatives to fastbrowse on Agent Skills Hub include concierge, web-agent-protocol, atlas-mcp-server. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse LLM Plugin tools