by agentailor · MCP Server · ★ 131
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/IBJunior/fullstack-langgraph-nextjs-agent.git
Taken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 131 |
| Forks | 30 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 74/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-04 |
| Created | 2025-09-28 |
| Platforms | mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
LangGraph.js AI Agent Template A production-ready Next.js template for building AI agents with LangGraph.js, featuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) integration, human-in-the-loop tool approval, and persistent memory.
Looking for a fullstack-langgraph-nextjs-agent alternative? If you're comparing fullstack-langgraph-nextjs-agent with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
An introduction to the world of AI Agents
Polymcp provides a simple and efficient way to interact with MCP servers using custom agents
Official python implementation of UTCP. UTCP is an open standard that lets AI agents call any API directly, wi
Browser Operator - The AI browser with built in Multi-Agent platform! Open source alternative to ChatGPT Atlas
A transparent, minimal, and hackable agent framework. ~300 lines of readable code. Full control, no magic.
Code from tutorials presented on the "Code AI with Rok" YouTube channel
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: