by agentcathq · MCP Server · ★ 53
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 53 |
| Forks | 9 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 69/100 |
| Open Issues | 6 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-03 |
| Created | 2025-05-31 |
| Platforms | cli, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
Getting Started · Features · Docs · Website · Open Source · Schedule a Demo [!IMPORTANT
These tools work well together with agentcat-python-sdk for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a agentcat-python-sdk alternative? If you're comparing agentcat-python-sdk with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
MCPcat is an analytics platform for MCP server owners 🐱.
Desktop app that automatically scans and blocks malicious MCP traffic in AI apps like Cursor, Claude, VS Code
ToolHive is an application that allows you to install, manage and run MCP servers and connect them to AI agent
🤖 Taskade MCP · Official MCP server and OpenAPI to MCP codegen. Build AI agent tools from any OpenAPI API and
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides advanced code analysis and reasoning capabilities powered
World's First Autonomous Open-source Pretrained AI Employees Platform
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: